How We Rate Casinos

Our reviews are documentation-based. We do not claim first-hand play testing unless it actually took place — every review is built from the operator’s own published documents. Sources rank in a fixed order: operator official documents first, then regulator records, then reputable industry reporting, and material facts need two independent confirmations before they are published. Each casino receives an editorial score on a visible 1–5 scale that weighs licensing, bonus terms, payment conditions, game selection and support quality — without pretending to a precision the underlying documents cannot support.

Licence Verification

We check every licence against the regulator’s public register — Malta Gaming Authority, Curaçao, Anjouan or the relevant national authority — not against the operator’s own claim. If a licence number cannot be found in the issuing register, the review says so.

Terms and Bonus Analysis

We read the full terms and conditions and the complete bonus rules: wagering requirements, win caps, maximum bet limits, game weighting and expiry windows. Where an operator’s marketing promises something its own terms contradict, the review calls the mismatch out as “Claim vs T&Cs”.

Payout Windows and Catalog Data

Withdrawal and payout times shown on this site are operator-published values only. Where an operator publishes no timeframe, we write “not published” or “Varies” — never a plausible-looking estimate. Game counts and provider lists come from operator or provider published data; official partner figures may serve as a floor for scraped values.

Re-Verification Cadence

Bonus terms are re-checked roughly weekly. Payout rules, game counts and licence status are re-checked roughly monthly. A full review refresh happens whenever the underlying documents change. The same cadence is described in our updates policy.